Skip to main content

Civility in the Classroom: Practical Advice for Faculty Members

Faculty members are responsible for management of the classroom environment. Teachers can be compared to judges: both focus on relevant issues, set reasonable time limits, assess the quality of ideas and expression, and make sure participants are heard in an orderly manner. While their ultimate goals may be different, both judges and teachers need to exercise authority with a sense of fairness.

Both students and faculty members have some measure of academic freedom. University policies on classroom disruption cannot be used to punish lawful classroom dissent. The lawful expression of a disagreement with the teacher or other students is not in itself “disruptive” behavior.

Rudeness, incivility, and disruption are often distinguishable, even though they may intersect. In most instances, it’s better to respond to rudeness by example (e.g. advising a student in private that they appear to have a habit of interrupting others). Rudeness can become disruption when it is repetitive, especially after a warning has been given.

Strategies to prevent and respond to disruptive behavior include:

(This document has been adapted with permission from SYNTHESIS: Law and Policy in Higher Education, Spring 1997.)